FAITH CELEBRATION FELLOWSHIP To be instruments of God, to seek and to serve people near and far to become fully devoted followers of the Lord and Savior Jesus Christ

Super Soaker Challenge at REFUEL Nite

July 17, 2009
5:00 pmto9:30 pm

Super Soaker Challenge at REFUEL Nite

This might be everything you need all summer long…

Super Soaker Challenge

Friday, 07/17/09 @ FCF.

Free for all.
No white tee’s (raincoats welcome).
Bring your water guns / super soakers.

Just $2 for your sustenance (a.k.a. food)

Come @ 5:00 PM for Super Soaker Challenge.
Youth REFUEL Nite starts @ 7:30 PM.

8200 Coldwater Canyon Avenue
North Hollywood, CA 91605

For more info call (818) 472 3581.
Follow us at twitter.com/fcfuth.

23 Comments

  1. bellecagas wrote on
    Tuesday, July 14, 2009 at 6:51 pm | Permalink

    In this context, explain: 07>17<09
    Not so mathematical. It’s random.

  2. MarvinOrdono wrote on
    Tuesday, July 14, 2009 at 7:09 pm | Permalink

    hmm… this is a tuffy.

    well, 07 or 09 are not greater than 17, which makes the inequality impossible. But then God makes things impossible, possible. Therefore, inducing that no matter what kind of ‘Problem’ comes our way (not pertaining to arithmatic ones), God has a solution to it, we just can’t see it with our mental-selves, but we have to trust in what is unseen and believe God for the answer.

    Final answer. haha

  3. Peter Parker wrote on
    Tuesday, July 14, 2009 at 9:25 pm | Permalink

    July 17, 2009

  4. MarvinOrdono wrote on
    Wednesday, July 15, 2009 at 2:52 am | Permalink

    idk…

    seems to simple for that. haha

  5. bellecagas wrote on
    Wednesday, July 15, 2009 at 9:36 am | Permalink

    Good guess.
    Here’s a clue, I did say, “it’s not so mathematical” yet it does involve some math logic. It has something to do with the measurement of time. So, July 7, 2009 is not so far of an answer. However, it must have backing solutions. To make it a little bit more complicated, 7 & 17 are prime numbers. Hope that helps.

    (When you find out the real answer, you will be amazed at how this inequality is purely born out of imaginative random minds. Extremely lame, but worth exercising your logic muscles.)

  6. Peter Parker wrote on
    Wednesday, July 15, 2009 at 10:11 am | Permalink

    You are so cool MarvinOrdono! Yeah! Nothing is impossible with God!

    Okay bellecagas. Is the event still the context of your pseudo-mathematical equation? Or simply the measurement of time? Or both?

  7. bellecagas wrote on
    Wednesday, July 15, 2009 at 10:49 am | Permalink

    I must say both. The simple answer relating to the context of events is the date. That’s clear. However, the inequality goes beyond the simplicity of the date itself. Here’s another clear easy clue.. Each number represents something thus solves the inequality basing on what it represents. Solve it, then ull find out the answer is quite simple. Very. I’ve given probably 75% of the answer away with this clue. Another clue, there are at least a few ways to show ur solutions.

  8. Peter Parker wrote on
    Wednesday, July 15, 2009 at 12:51 pm | Permalink

    1) 7 months is longer than 17 days which shorter than 2009 years.

    2) 17 days is shorter than 7 months and 2009 years.

    That doesn’t solve anything because it’s not really a mathematical equation. It’s simply making a statement. By “solving” you meant explain why the greater than and less than symbols are thrown in there. Right?

  9. Peter Parker wrote on
    Wednesday, July 15, 2009 at 1:35 pm | Permalink

    Oh you are right! Solve for the unit of measurement… Wait, what do 7 and 17 being prime numbers have to do with it???

  10. bellecagas wrote on
    Wednesday, July 15, 2009 at 9:33 pm | Permalink

    Nice. Exactly, solve=explain (that’s what I said in my very first comment).

    That wasn’t too hard, was it? Correction, this is NOT a mathematical EQUATION because it IS an INEQUALITY. You will NEVER be able to “solve” it. You can only give a statement/explanation of what the variables represent.

    Here are few ways to show your answers:
    1.) The simplest would be,
    7 months > 17 days 1717<733285

    The prime numbers just adds a little bit more complication to finding the answer. That’s a totally different story. (lol) But since the answer has been revealed, it is now totally irrelevant.

    Congratulations! You are now officially a geek.

    (lol)

  11. bellecagas wrote on
    Wednesday, July 15, 2009 at 9:35 pm | Permalink

    That was weird, my answers didnt show. Here it is again.

    Here are few ways to show your answers:
    1.) The simplest would be,
    7 months > 17 days 1717<733285

    The prime numbers just adds a little bit more complication to finding the answer. That’s a totally different story. (lol) But since the answer has been revealed, it is now totally irrelevant.

  12. bellecagas wrote on
    Wednesday, July 15, 2009 at 9:37 pm | Permalink

    i dont what happened there. oh well.

  13. Rhino wrote on
    Wednesday, July 15, 2009 at 10:58 pm | Permalink

    TOO MUCH MATH

    my head…it hurts.

  14. Rhino wrote on
    Wednesday, July 15, 2009 at 10:58 pm | Permalink

    your answers showed up, I just had to approve them first.

  15. bellecagas wrote on
    Wednesday, July 15, 2009 at 10:59 pm | Permalink

    It was missing #s 2 and 3. HAHAH I elaborated on the answers. I think my comment was too long.

  16. bellecagas wrote on
    Wednesday, July 15, 2009 at 11:22 pm | Permalink

    Or, im thinking, is it cause of the inequality signs that didn’t allow it to show? Cause the rest of my message showed up.

    I think this is the longest “comment-thread” there has been. not sure.

    Also, U GUYS BE READY. My super-soaker will soak you up. You will need a raincoat, seriously. BWAHAHAH!

  17. Rhino wrote on
    Thursday, July 16, 2009 at 6:27 am | Permalink

    im just gonna bring the hose. or maybe a bukket.

  18. Peter Parker wrote on
    Thursday, July 16, 2009 at 8:56 am | Permalink

    Bellus Dorkus Maximus Galorus!

  19. Peter Parker wrote on
    Thursday, July 16, 2009 at 8:57 am | Permalink

    I wish I can go to church that early. I’d bring a bucket too! LOL.

  20. bellecagas wrote on
    Thursday, July 16, 2009 at 11:12 am | Permalink

    That’s funny. But God still loves us, dorks.

  21. Rhino wrote on
    Thursday, July 16, 2009 at 1:11 pm | Permalink

    I wonder if anybody ever called Jesus the Aramaic equivalent of “dork” when he was a kid? I wonder what He said back to them if they did?

  22. bellecagas wrote on
    Thursday, July 16, 2009 at 2:00 pm | Permalink

    LOL. That would be really funny! I tried looking it up, it said: “The word ‘dork’ was not found in the dictionary, please try again using another variation of the word.” Hahah

  23. Rhino wrote on
    Friday, July 17, 2009 at 11:56 am | Permalink

    try “dorkface” maybe that’s a variation that will work? :D

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *
*
*